Pages

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Polanski

雖然事發三十多年前, 不過罪始終是罪. 你的電影多棒, 你怎樣逃過納粹的魔掌, 那始終是一宗性騷擾女童案. 我同意他接受引渡返美國.

名聲和功績不代表犯過的事可以不被審判就一走了之.

有關新聞: Polanski’s Arrest Could Lead to Extradition

10 comments:

bittermelon said...

我和你的想法相同.在報張看到有電影人聯署要求釋放他,真令人費解,難道他在電影的貢獻就可以彌補犯下的罪過嗎?

Jerk said...

但一般預計都係輕判...

路過的

mad dog said...

bittermelon: exactly!

jerk: 日本好似十五年後就咩事都當無事

uncleray said...

同意,可況他犯下的也不是小事了。

Kempton said...

I want to be clear, adult having sex with a child is a criminal offence in North America.

Also, every one is and should be treated equally under the law. So there should be no special treatment even for a famous director.

Now, having said the above, I think creditable and informed comments will require understanding of the matters beyond the scope of one or two news articles can provide.

Gossip or 吹吹水 (which is what I do most of the time) and informed analysis (legal) are totally different thing.

mad dog said...

uncleray: 絕對是.

kempton: i know, according to some news report, the then 13-yr old girl "is asking that the Oscar-winning director’s case be dismissed", but still, he should be bought to a US court...

plum said...

性騷擾女童案?

係強姦吧

這世界有兩樣野,我不能原諒,殺人同強姦...

mad dog said...

plum: 新聞寫係"性騷擾女童案", 當然大家都會認為係強姦啦. 要等上庭.

Anonymous said...

我在這邊看新聞,得到的訊息應是「強姦女童」。雖然當事人走出來說不想告他,但他應該面對審判。如果佢清白,就唔會唔敢返美國啦!很奇怪有人會覺得這是三十年前的案子、他又非常出名,所以就不需要拒捕他?不知道是什麼logic.

mad dog said...

chusherry: i know, also "sodomy"... he should face the court!